Tamilnadu Chief Minister had made some abusive remarks against Lord Ram, a God incarnate of Hindus. He is a known atheist and is brain washed with Dravidian ideology. Many people dare him make similar comments on other religious figures if he is really an atheist. But I know, he can never take up this challenge as this will alienate his minority vote bank. In fact, his comments on Lord Ram not only make him look like a fool but also brought into public view his unethical and degenerated life style. When he wanted the proof of Ram’s existence to believe him, some wonder whether he believes that he is the son of his own father, as he has not seen the proof of it.
This gentleman was so much inspired by the great killer Stalin, he named his son after him. And you know, it was believed that Stalin was responsible for the death of more than three million people but recent findings put that figure as high as 20 million. These shameless demagogues who divide the society in the name of caste, creed and sect are not worth even to utter Rama's name. Earlier, in an affidavit to Supreme Court, Indian Govt submitted that there is no historical proof of Lord Ram. What else to expect from a Government, which is headed by a bunch of psycophants?
I am just wondering what made these people to hate their own religion, their own culture and their own ancestors. What is the basis of this Dravidian thought? This all started with now debunk Aryan Invasion theory. This theory was proposed by some racist Europeans. Europeans, particularly Germans and Britishers, killed several million innocents in the name of race in the last century. These racists thought that there can not be a better civilization, religion and language than their own. British imperialists who occupied India, furthered this theory to justify their occupation of India saying that Aryans were nomads from Iran and not from India. When it was found that Sanskrit was mother of all European languages, they brought up another theory that Sanskrit too was not Indian.
I quote the following passage from an authentic source:
One person who reported about this is Deen Chandora in his article, Distorted Historical Events and Discredited Hindu Chronology, as it appeared in Revisiting Indus-Sarasvati Age and Ancient India (p. 383). He explains that the idea of the Aryan invasion was certainly not a matter of misguided research, but was a conspiracy to distribute deliberate misinformation that was formulated on April 10, 1866 in London at a secret meeting held in the Royal Asiatic Society. This was “to induct the theory of the Aryan invasion of India, so that no Indian may say that English are foreigners. . . India was ruled all along by outsiders and so the country must remain a slave under the benign Christian rule.” This was a political move and this theory was put to solid use in all schools and colleges.
British destroyed the native education system by abolishing several hundred thousands of Gurukulas and made it illegal to give any support to these schools. Lord Macaulay's "Minute on Indian Education" speech gave a road map on how to destroy Indian Education system and replace with that of his agenda. Macaulay largely succeeded then as most of the educated Indians were brain washed with these theories in the new British education system. Dravidian thought came into existence thus. They started believing that Aryans were foreigners and brought Hinduism and Sanskrit to India along with them and forced it on native Dravidians.
Now the new research has proven that Aryan Invasion was a myth and this theory, in fact, was a sinister design by some racist Europeans. The new findings show that Indian civilization is the oldest civilization and Sanskrit was born in India. But alas, the damage was already done. People brain washed with these theories were not ready to accept it. Mr. Karunanidhi was one of those brain washed Dravidian. There were also attempts by these Dravidians to include all south Indians into their fold by saying all south Indian languages were originated from Tamil, but thankfully, they have not succeeded. Babar could have destroyed Sri Ram Temple at Ayodya but he could not eliminate Ram from the hearts of Hindus. These new age Babars are at work again to complete the unfinished agenda.
http://www.bharatwisdom.com/Blogs/tabid/418/EntryID/14/Default.aspx
No comments:
Post a Comment