In India, there is a trend among Politicians, other than BJP, to defend the rights of Minority communities, specially the Christians and Muslims, eying their solid vote bank. Parties play different tactics to get the votes of these communities - one can not say which one party is best. Now, read the below article, published in India Forum Discussions.An English Translation of Smt. Sasikala Teacher's Speech
It's used as a cat's paw so the culprit may remain unnameable. Hence no one calls the 'secular' media or governments for what it is (or even the governance of the christocolonials). In India, christianism commits all its crimes against Hindu Dharma under the name of secularism. ("RamarSethu needs to be broken for.") It's a method pioneered by the christocolonials from Britain. Works like a charm.
And christianism is the puppeteer in the shadows that's enabling and consolidating islamism in Bharatam (and is similarly giving naxals and other communiterrorists a free hand). Without christianism in power, and with Hindus in charge of anti-terrorism, islamoterrorist clubs would have been nipped in the bud. But christianism is curtailing all law-and-order in Dharmic land and encouraging islamic terrorism to sprout all over. Naturally, eager islamism doesn't miss the opportunity to grow in such congenial soil.
The head is christianism; islamism has a borrowed head for now. And communism really had nowhere to grow anymore until christianism decided to water the dying plant that should by all rights have died. There's still only really one head between them, though given enough time the other two may have grown their own.
Source: http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/1317-dmks-and-ap-target-hindu-temples/page__st__40
QUOTE
Now in our cities and towns the prime locations are occupied by churches and mosques. Where are those fierce left-wing ideologues that had appropriated Hindu temple lands? Why don't they grab these lands and give them to the landless poor? Or is it that the onerous responsibility of implementing socialism vested only with the Hindus, just like secularism is? Secularism is now the responsibility of the Hindus and not any others. Only Hindus need bear that odious burden.
QUOTE
Several hundreds of thousands of acres of forest lands vested with the temples. Those too were grabbed by the government. But could the government protect those lands? Those confiscated temple lands are now occupied by Christians who are clearing the forest lands for ecologically destructive commercial mono-culture cropping.
What is the use of talking about protecting nature so late in the day? Did not the Hindus protect those precious forest lands as part of temple property? But the Marxist government that grabbed temple lands did not protect the forests.
A vicar was allegedly murdered in Tirutti-parambu village, but the place lying closed is not a church. A temple is shut down. Why? The local church was not closed even for one day, but the temple has its doors locked down. Who do you think is guilty? We, Hindus are guilty. We are guilty of being cowardly. We looked on with indifference and despair. If there were some men among us, men with manliness, would this have happened? If the people had backbone, if the society had strength of character, would its traditional place of worship been closed by any body?
Why was the temple closed? Did the Hindu God commit murder? They want to close temples at some pretext or the other. They resent the functioning of temples, these commies and other anti-Hindu secular politicians, because they resent Hindu prosperity. They know that Hindu prosperity is closely intertwined with the healthy functioning of Hindu temples which are economic engines in their own right. The Hindu temples and temple properties belong to the Hindu people. The Hindu temples should take up the burden of alleviating poverty among the devotees. If Guruvayur temple uses its cash collections of one month, it can adopt a village and remove the poverty of its Hindu people. The temple funds are Hindus wealth and the Hindus have exclusive rights to it. Secularists and atheists have no business utilising temple funds.
About the last bit. 'Secularism' in India is a calculated christian clockwork-operated bomb that's released upon a preplanned trajectory. Despite how it's projected, secularism in India is not an independent mechanism that's ignorant of its effects and crimes ('objective'). It is specifically directed at Hindus. What is the use of talking about protecting nature so late in the day? Did not the Hindus protect those precious forest lands as part of temple property? But the Marxist government that grabbed temple lands did not protect the forests.
A vicar was allegedly murdered in Tirutti-parambu village, but the place lying closed is not a church. A temple is shut down. Why? The local church was not closed even for one day, but the temple has its doors locked down. Who do you think is guilty? We, Hindus are guilty. We are guilty of being cowardly. We looked on with indifference and despair. If there were some men among us, men with manliness, would this have happened? If the people had backbone, if the society had strength of character, would its traditional place of worship been closed by any body?
Why was the temple closed? Did the Hindu God commit murder? They want to close temples at some pretext or the other. They resent the functioning of temples, these commies and other anti-Hindu secular politicians, because they resent Hindu prosperity. They know that Hindu prosperity is closely intertwined with the healthy functioning of Hindu temples which are economic engines in their own right. The Hindu temples and temple properties belong to the Hindu people. The Hindu temples should take up the burden of alleviating poverty among the devotees. If Guruvayur temple uses its cash collections of one month, it can adopt a village and remove the poverty of its Hindu people. The temple funds are Hindus wealth and the Hindus have exclusive rights to it. Secularists and atheists have no business utilising temple funds.
It's used as a cat's paw so the culprit may remain unnameable. Hence no one calls the 'secular' media or governments for what it is (or even the governance of the christocolonials). In India, christianism commits all its crimes against Hindu Dharma under the name of secularism. ("RamarSethu needs to be broken for
And christianism is the puppeteer in the shadows that's enabling and consolidating islamism in Bharatam (and is similarly giving naxals and other communiterrorists a free hand). Without christianism in power, and with Hindus in charge of anti-terrorism, islamoterrorist clubs would have been nipped in the bud. But christianism is curtailing all law-and-order in Dharmic land and encouraging islamic terrorism to sprout all over. Naturally, eager islamism doesn't miss the opportunity to grow in such congenial soil.
The head is christianism; islamism has a borrowed head for now. And communism really had nowhere to grow anymore until christianism decided to water the dying plant that should by all rights have died. There's still only really one head between them, though given enough time the other two may have grown their own.
Source: http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/1317-dmks-and-ap-target-hindu-temples/page__st__40
No comments:
Post a Comment